Sabine Knierbein: Tensions between Urban Care and Uncare: Situating care ethics, care labor and caring relations in an everyday-theory based approach to urban studies
Thursday 30 October at 10:15-11:00, Auditorium A1
Abstract: The discourse on care has been on in the spatial arts, social science and humanities disciplines for a while right now: It has invited urban scholars to rethink the political through a moral philosophy on care ethics; to revisit the social by further advancing feminist critiques of Marxist (and other) thought) ; and to re-address the cultural through a focus on the body in geographies of everyday life, where moments of presence can be turned into moments of encounter, thus shaping geographies of encounter, and processes of learning. Care here has urban dimensions, the City is understood as harbouring constant social change and Democracy, in a radical care perspective, is first and foremost a spatial trope. By offering an intersectional analytical approach that combines the urban and spatial study of care ethics, care labor and caring relations, counter-individualist narratives are set up that help to frame humans as always being in (social, cultural, political) relations with other humans, and non-humans. What does radical mean in these three – political, cultural and social – dimensions of care? And why is care seen as radically needed to rethink also the ecological and economic practices to actualize urban democracy, too?
Päivi Kymäläinen: Places of justice and radical care
Thursday 30 October at 11:00-11:45, Auditorium A1
Abstract: Place is one of the key concepts in understanding urban everyday life, yet its theoretical importance has not been fully acknowledged. By taking four conceptual viewpoints to place, I will discuss how places frame social life, as well as the practices of justice and caring in urban contexts. Place thinking offers various intellectual tools depending on if places are regarded as territories and locations; as meaningful urban spaces; as processes; or as agents. The concept of place offers perspectives for analysing especially mundane practices and experiences in which the formal aspects of justice (such as distributional and processual justice) are accompanied by more informal ones (such as recognition). I will ask how care might be constituted in relation to (just) places, and what radical care could mean in today’s urbanism.
Ross Beveridge: Urban Democracy as Ethos, Strategy and Practice
Friday 31 October at 13:40-14:30, Auditorium A1
Abstract: This paper outlines a project of democracy as urban self-government drawing on urban theory and the radical democracy tradition. Urban democracy, as understood here, is not architectonic, a project premised on a structured institutional model, like the state, but rests on political practices and common experiences of urbanity. This can lead to criticism that urban democracy is hard to define and is unrealizable as well as inadequate in the face of political power. To counter this line of argument, and with reference to recent European examples, the paper articulates urban democracy as an ethos, strategy and practice. In doing so, it confronts (1) democracy’s resonance as a political project of urban collective life; (2) democracy’s relationship with power, capitalism and the state; and (3) democracy’s multiple and mutable modes of being political. Urban democracy is, in essence, a decentralizing and fragmenting force. However, greater attention to these three components (ethos, strategy and practice), and greater learning and cooperation between projects, can facilitate the advance of urban democracy.


